Abstract
No translate
No translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
Chia sẻ bài viết
References
1.
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.006.
2.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036.
3.
Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1972). Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: A five-year panel study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2), 185–200.
4.
Babu, M. D., Prasad, K. B., & Prasad, U. T. (2024). RETRACTED: Impact of ambidextrous leadership on innovative work behaviour and employee performance in the IT sector. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33124.
5.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
6.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration.
7.
Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., & Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570.
8.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
9.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V, & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65.
10.
Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L., & Aselage, J. (2009). Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: which leads to which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119–124.
11.
Đạm, N. Đ. (2018). Nguyên nhân và một số biện pháp phòng, chống stress ở học viên các trường đại học quân sự.
12.
Dhar, R. L. (2016). Ethical leadership and its impact on service innovative behavior: The role of LMX and job autonomy. Tourism Management, 57, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.011.
13.
Emanuel, A., Katzir, M., & Liberman, N. (2022). Why do people increase effort near a deadline? An opportunity-cost model of goal gradients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(11), 2910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001218.
14.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
15.
Ghasemi, F. (2024). Time‐lagged effects of student misbehavior on teacher counterproductive work behaviors: The role of negative affect and regulatory focus. Psychology in the Schools, 61(7), 2845–2863. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23193.
16.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
17.
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513.
18.
Han, J., Yin, H., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Job demands and resources as antecedents of university teachers’ exhaustion, engagement and job satisfaction. Educational Psychology, 40(3), 318–335.
19.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
20.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
21.
Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. (2007). A review of employee well‐being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 299–306.
22.
Im, A. Y., Cho, S., & Kim, D.-Y. (2024). The cost of rude customers: customer incivility and employee performance. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(13), 2031–2047. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2294482.
23.
James, A. (2011). Work–life (im)‘balance’and its consequences for everyday learning and innovation in the New Economy: evidence from the Irish IT sector. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(5), 655–684.
24.
James, A. (2014). Work–life ‘balance’, recession and the gendered limits to learning and innovation (or, why it pays employers to care). Gender, Work & Organization, 21(3), 273–294.
25.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038.
26.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509–523.
27.
Kim, J., Prempeh, A. A., Addai, E. K., & Wargo, E. (2025). The effect of knowledge sharing on innovative work behaviour at higher education institutions. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(1), e12574. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12574.
28.
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2012). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273.
29.
Kraft, M. A., & Monti-Nussbaum, M. (2021). The big problem with little interruptions to classroom learning. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211028856. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211028856.
30.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
31.
Kuutila, M., Mäntylä, M., Farooq, U., & Claes, M. (2020). Time pressure in software engineering: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 121, 106257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106257.
32.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169.
33.
LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775.
34.
Luật Sửa Đổi, Bổ Sung Một Số Điều Của Luật Giáo Dục Đại Học (Luật Số 34/2018/QH14) (2018).
35.
Martin, P. , Salanova, M. , & Peiro, J. M. (2007). Job demands, job resources and individual innovation at work: Going beyond Karasek’s model? Psicothema, 19, 621–626. www.psicothema.com
36.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.
37.
Petrušić, I., & Čeh Časni, A. (2023). Povezanost nastavne i istraživačke djelatnosti sveučilišta iz perspektive vanjskoga vrednovanja kvalitete. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 25(3), 947–976. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v25i3.4797.
38.
Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2115.
39.
Sacre, H., Akel, M., Haddad, C., Zeenny, R. M., Hajj, A., & Salameh, P. (2023). The effect of research on the perceived quality of teaching: a cross-sectional study among university students in Lebanon. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-03998-8.
40.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
41.
Shin, Y., Hur, W.-M., & Hwang, H. (2022). Impacts of customer incivility and abusive supervision on employee performance: A comparative study of the pre-and post-COVID-19 periods. Service Business, 16(2), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-021-00456-7.
42.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession. Creative Education, 7(13), 1785–1799.
43.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job demands and job resources as predictors of teacher motivation and well-being. Social Psychology of Education, 21(5), 1251–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9464-8
44.
Stremersch, S., Winer, R. S., & Camacho, N. (2021). Faculty Research Incentives and Business School Health: A New Perspective from and for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211001050
45.
Tamami, A. S., Azizah, L. Z., & Jamaluddin, M. (2025). Enhancing academic mindfulness through shaping-based time management: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS), 5(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.18860/jips.v5i2.34092
46.
Thanh Nga. (2024). Nâng tỉ lệ giảng viên có trình độ tiến sĩ: Trách nhiệm của giảng viên và trường đại học. Tạp Chí Giáo Dục.
47.
Tran, H. Y., Chu, T. M., Diep, N. N., & Dai Long, K. (2025). The impact of individual and organizational factors on employee innovative work behavior: Empirical evidence from private companies in Vietnam. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.15.
48.
Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. In Psychoneuroendocrinology (Vol. 29, Number 5, pp. 567–592). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00091-X
49.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on Models of Job Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226.
50.
Wahab, F. A., Subramaniam, A., Ho, J. A., & Bali Mahomed, A. S. (2024). Augmenting Effect of Inclusive and Ambidextrous Leadership on Public University Academic Staffs’ Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Work Behavior. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241232761
51.
Zhang, Y. (2024). The Double-Edged Sword of Tension: How Moderate Stress Enhances Performance While Over-Focus Impairs It. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(9), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i9.2329
Authors
Files
Trích dẫn
Published
August 7, 2026
Ngày chỉnh sửa
August 22, 2026
Article Views147
Document Views133
Downloads19
Section
Bài nghiên cứu
Category
Tin tức
Pages
1-6
Copyright Holder
2026 Tạp chí khoa học thương mại
Cited-by Summary
- Citing journals 0
- Distinct citing articles 0
- Total citation records 0
Related
Other articles in this issue
TẠP CHÍ SỐ 216
No translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
No translate
Read moreNo translate
No translate
Read more